That insecurity could result in a development nightmare later. The thing to be afraid of is what happens if one of these providers ceases to exist. From there, you access the data via a rich API that can be integrated into a front-end experience.Īs I said, these services are young, but the concept is sound. While this concept is still in its infancy, it is an interesting way to start promoting the idea of headless/decoupled CMS platforms.īasically, you utilize these services to organize content into a taxonomy that you define. Services like Contentful are offering hosted, SaaS-based content management. “Content as a Service” is a unique new product that is being introduced. The biggest WCMS platforms today are, as I mentioned, mostly integrated, which means that in the future, they will have to decide what path they choose to take in terms of architecture. It is our believe that decoupling the administrative portal from the front-end user experience will allow for better a user experience, longer software installation lifespans, and safer, more secure management. This is the classic coupled architecture. These platforms are typically of an architecture wherein the delivery or distribution of content is tightly integrated with the administrative capabilities. ![]() ![]() ![]() That includes WordPress, Drupal, SiteCore, Joomla, and any software originally developed for web content delivery. Most platforms that populate search results for “CMS” fall into this category. “Web Content Management System” is a platform designed purely for the distribution of website content. The best bet for consumers of these platforms is to search for more specific terms such as those listed below to find a solution that more closely meets their requirements. However, this platform has many limitations and security concerns that are essential to vet before committing. This blanket term can lead to much confusion-mostly for those procuring such software-as it leads to the noisiest platforms garnering the most attention even if they are, in certain scenarios, the worst fit.įor example: The industry is doing a pretty good job of convincing almost all website owners that WordPress can get the job done for them-that is, any job. “Content Management System”, as I described earlier, is the catch-all term for systems that are powering most websites, managing most internal content, and distributing to different destinations. There are a variety of acronyms being used today to describe essentially the same set of tools. But the industry has taken advantage of the acronym and applied it to a limited set of functions, a definition that minimizes the importance and capabilities of true content management solutions. The definition of a CMS can vary greatly from organization to organization. It also means content that is more than just text in HTML form. It may include tools to enable content to be produced and analyzed within one platform. It involves the management of content in a structured, organized way with ability to distribute content to multiple channels. However, true “content management” is a much deeper concept than simply managing a website. The topic is this: What does the term “CMS” really mean?Ī cursory Google search for “CMS” produces results that mostly skew in the direction of website management. In last week’s blog post, I touched upon a topic that has been on my list to write about for quite some time one that is so compelling, it deserves a post all to itself.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |